Myth 1: "It's Just a Phase—A Trend or Social Contagion"#
You've probably heard some version of this: being transgender is a "fad," something young people adopt because of social media or peer pressure. The clinical-sounding term "Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria" (ROGD) gets invoked to suggest people suddenly "catch" a trans identity rather than discovering something that was always there.
When I told people I was getting surgery nine weeks after my initial consultation, more than a few suggested I was "moving too fast." They didn't understand that I'd been living with genital dysphoria since age four. The decision wasn't rapid—it was thirty-seven years in the making. What looked sudden to outsiders was the culmination of a lifetime of knowing something was wrong.
The ROGD proposal came from a 2018 survey of parents recruited through websites concerned about youth transition; the young people were not interviewed. In its 2019 correction, PLOS ONE clarified that the study was hypothesis-generating and did not establish a diagnosis or a distinct clinical pathway. A parent's experience of a sudden disclosure cannot, by itself, establish when a young person first understood their gender.
A 2022 clinical-data study examined predictions of the proposed ROGD pathway among transgender adolescents and did not find support for a distinct rapid-onset pattern (Bauer et al., 2022). That finding does not tell anyone how long a particular person has known; it does show why a family's first hearing about an identity is a poor proxy for its beginning.
A 2025 longitudinal study compared 317 children who had socially transitioned with cisgender siblings and other cisgender peers. In this supported, early-transitioning group, gender identity changed no more or less often than in the comparison groups (deMayo et al., 2025). The sample does not represent every transgender young person, but it does not support the claim that trans identity is uniquely unstable.
You may encounter providers who question whether you've "really" thought this through, or who impose waiting periods beyond what's clinically indicated. Insurance companies may require additional documentation to prove your identity isn't a phase. Family members may cite "social contagion" as a reason to delay support. Having the facts helps, but you shouldn't need to argue for your own reality. A provider who treats your identity as suspect isn't providing good care. You deserve better.
Transgender and gender-diverse people have existed across cultures throughout recorded history. Indigenous North American communities have long recognized Two-Spirit identities. The Hijras of South Asia have documented roles spanning over 800 years. Samoan fa'afafine are accepted as a natural part of their communities (Elm et al., 2022; Hinchy, 2022; Robinson, 2020). Your identity isn't a modern invention—it's part of a vast spectrum of human experience that has been acknowledged around the world for generations.
Myth 2: "Being Transgender Is a Mental Illness"#
This myth conflates identity with pathology. Let's be precise about what the medical consensus actually says—and why that distinction matters for accessing care.
Being transgender is not a mental illness. The World Health Organization's explanation of ICD-11 says that gender incongruence moved from the mental-disorders chapter to the chapter on conditions related to sexual health, reflecting that trans and gender-diverse identities are not conditions of mental ill-health. The classification keeps a pathway to care without treating identity itself as a disorder.
The diagnosis "gender dysphoria" is often misunderstood. It doesn't diagnose your identity—it describes the distress some transgender people experience when their body or social role doesn't align with their sense of self (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). The diagnosis exists to facilitate access to care, not to label transgender people as disordered. An analogy: being left-handed isn't a disorder. But if you were forced to write exclusively with your right hand, you'd experience distress. The problem isn't your left-handedness—it's the mismatch between your natural inclination and external demands. Gender dysphoria works similarly. The distress comes from incongruence, not from being transgender.
It's true that transgender people experience higher rates of anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation than the general population. But extensive research attributes this to minority stress—the chronic burden of navigating stigma, discrimination, rejection, and barriers to care—not to anything inherent about being transgender (Meyer, 2003; Testa et al., 2015). When these external pressures are reduced and affirming care is provided, mental health outcomes improve dramatically.
During my surgical journey, the mental health challenges I experienced weren't because I wanted to be a nullo—they were because I spent hours on hold with clinics that didn't understand my needs, dealt with insurance bureaucracy, and worried constantly about whether I could afford the surgery. That stress was circumstantial, not inherent to my identity.
The "mental illness" framing creates real barriers. Providers may pathologize your identity rather than addressing your actual healthcare needs. Insurance companies may classify gender-affirming procedures as treating a psychiatric condition rather than a medical one, affecting coverage decisions. You may be required to obtain psychiatric clearances that aren't required for comparable procedures in cisgender patients.
Trying to change a transgender person's identity is not a treatment for distress. In a 2022 prospective cohort at one U.S. clinic, young people who initiated puberty blockers or hormones had lower observed odds of depression and suicidality over 12 months than those who had not initiated them (Tordoff et al., 2022). The study reports an association, not a guarantee or proof that treatment alone caused the difference. Care should respond to the person in front of the clinician, including their goals and circumstances.
Myth 3: "Transgender People Are a Threat in Bathrooms"#
This myth frames transgender people—especially trans women—as potential predators to justify excluding us from public spaces. It's a scare tactic with no evidentiary basis.
In a Massachusetts study of local criminal incident reports, the Williams Institute found no increase in restroom, locker-room, or changing-room safety incidents after gender-identity protections were enacted (Hasenbush et al., 2019). That is evidence about the places and period studied, not a prediction about every individual encounter.
A 2019 cross-sectional study in Pediatrics of 3,673 transgender and nonbinary adolescents found an association between school restroom or locker-room restrictions and higher reported sexual-assault risk; the estimated risk ratio for transgender girls was 2.49 (Murchison et al., 2019). Because the data were observational, the study cannot establish that restrictions alone caused the assaults.
A Williams Institute review of the 2022 U.S. Transgender Survey reports that 58% of respondents said they had ever avoided going out in public because they lacked access to a safe bathroom. That is a survey finding about respondents' experiences, not a population-wide estimate. It still gives a concrete sense of how access affects participation in daily life.
Bathroom fears may seem tangential to surgery, but they're part of a broader pattern of framing transgender people as threats requiring restriction. This framing affects healthcare policy, insurance coverage decisions, and the overall climate in which you seek care. More practically: surgical recovery often involves limited mobility and frequent bathroom needs. If you're recovering away from home—as I was for a month in San Francisco—navigating public restrooms while visibly post-surgical adds stress to an already demanding situation. Knowing the facts about bathroom safety won't eliminate that stress, but it can help you recognize that the fear is manufactured, not rational.
Myth 4: "You'll Regret It—Gender-Affirming Care Is Experimental"#
This myth attacks the pathways that bring us peace, portraying evidence-based medicine as reckless experimentation. It's the myth I encountered most directly when preparing for surgery, and it deserves thorough dismantling.
Gender-affirming care has established clinical guidelines, including WPATH's open-access Standards of Care Version 8 (Coleman et al., 2022). Specific interventions, evidence, eligibility, and local legal access differ by age, procedure, and location. Ask a clinician to explain the evidence and tradeoffs for the care you are considering rather than accepting a blanket label like "experimental."
For a child, support can mean listening, using a chosen name, and making room for expression. Medical options for adolescents involve individualized assessment, a discussion of benefits and uncertainties, and rules that vary by jurisdiction. Puberty blockers pause pubertal development while used, but possible effects on bone health and fertility and the effects of subsequent treatment deserve a careful discussion; "fully reversible" is too simple a promise. See Hormone Therapy for a fuller explanation.
Regret matters, and people deserve honest information about it. A 2021 systematic review and meta-analysis pooled estimates from 27 studies and reported about 1% regret after gender-affirming surgery (Bustos et al., 2021). Definitions, follow-up, procedures, and patient populations varied across those studies, so that pooled figure cannot predict an individual's experience. Discuss your goals, possible complications, revision options, and uncertainty with your surgical team.
When people do stop or pause transition, research shows it's overwhelmingly due to external pressures rather than internal regret. A comprehensive study found that among those who had detransitioned, 82.5% attributed it to external factors—parental pressure, stigma, employment discrimination—while only 2.4% cited doubt about their gender identity (Turban et al., 2021). Long-term studies confirm lasting satisfaction. A 40-year follow-up found high patient satisfaction, improved dysphoria, and reduced mental health issues persisting decades after surgery, with no reported regret (Park et al., 2022). The Cornell What We Know Project reviewed 55 peer-reviewed studies and found 93% concluded that transition improves well-being; zero found that it causes overall harm (Cornell University, 2018).
When I was preparing for surgery, well-meaning people repeatedly asked whether I was "really sure." The questions sometimes felt less like an invitation to understand my goals and more like discomfort with a transgender person making an autonomous decision. You may encounter providers who emphasize worst-case scenarios, impose extra waiting periods, or refuse care. You deserve a discussion of risks that is candid and specific to your procedure, without having your identity treated as suspect.
One year post-surgery, I have zero regrets. The relief I experience daily, the freedom from dysphoria that plagued me for thirty-seven years, the ability to simply exist in my body without constant discomfort—every difficult moment of the journey was worth it.
Myth 5: "Transgender Rights Threaten Women"#
This myth attempts to divide communities that should be allied, suggesting that transgender existence somehow harms cisgender women or erases lesbian identity.
Gender identity and sexual orientation are distinct aspects of human experience that can exist in any combination (American Psychological Association, 2015). A trans woman attracted to women is a lesbian. A trans man attracted to men is a gay man. These identities don't erase anyone else's—they're part of the full spectrum of human diversity.
The feminist movement has long challenged biological determinism—the idea that anatomy dictates destiny. Trans-inclusive feminism extends this principle by recognizing that a person's internal sense of self, not their assigned sex, determines who they are. Anti-trans arguments often rely on the same biological essentialism that feminists have historically opposed.
Transgender people aren't newcomers to LGBTQ+ communities. Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera, both transgender women of color, were central figures in the 1969 Stonewall uprising that catalyzed the modern LGBTQ+ rights movement. They co-founded STAR (Street Transvestite Action Revolutionaries) to support homeless LGBTQ+ youth. Transgender people have been fighting alongside—not against—cisgender women and lesbians from the beginning.
The struggle for bodily autonomy connects all of us. The right to make decisions about your own body—whether that involves reproductive healthcare, gender-affirming care, or freedom from violence—is fundamentally the same fight (Ashley et al., 2024).
This myth creates social isolation that can complicate your surgical journey. You may encounter feminists or lesbians who view your transition with suspicion, or feel unwelcome in spaces that should be supportive. Building community becomes harder when potential allies have been convinced you're a threat. For those pursuing surgery, having affirming community matters enormously—for emotional support, practical assistance during recovery, and connection with others who understand your experience. Recognize that hostility from people who should be allies reflects their misinformation, not your validity.
Using This Information#
These myths share a common function: they position transgender people as problems to be solved rather than people deserving of respect and appropriate care. When you encounter them—in healthcare settings, family conversations, or your own moments of doubt—remember that the evidence consistently supports your right to exist as yourself and to access care that aligns your body with your identity.
In healthcare settings, if a provider expresses views rooted in these myths, you have options. You can share information if you have the energy, but you're not obligated to educate people who should know better. Seeking a different provider is legitimate. Your care shouldn't require winning a debate.
With family and friends, decide how much energy you want to invest. Some people are genuinely uninformed and open to learning. Others are committed to their positions regardless of evidence. Protecting your own wellbeing matters more than changing every mind.
In your own head, these myths can become internalized, creating doubt even when you know better. If you find yourself wondering whether you're "really" trans, whether you're moving too fast, whether you'll regret this—remember that these doubts often echo external narratives rather than your own authentic knowledge of yourself.
The facts in this guide are your resource, not your burden. You don't need to justify your existence with statistics. You don't need to counter every argument to deserve care. Your identity is real regardless of what anyone else believes about it.
Reflection Questions#
Which myths in this guide have you encountered personally? How did those experiences affect you?
Have any of these myths become internalized—showing up as your own doubts rather than external voices? How might you distinguish between genuine uncertainty and absorbed misinformation?
When you encounter these narratives, what response serves your wellbeing? Fighting back, disengaging, seeking support—different situations may call for different approaches.
Who in your life is genuinely open to learning, and who has demonstrated they're not? How does this distinction affect where you invest your energy?
What would it feel like to hold your own truth as valid regardless of whether others accept it?
References#
Advanced Dermatology. (2023, June). Americans' tattoo preferences and regrets data study 2023. https://www.advdermatology.com/blog/americans-tattoo-regrets-2023-data-study/
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
American Psychological Association. (2015). Guidelines for psychological practice with transgender and gender nonconforming people. American Psychologist, 70(9), 832–864. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039906
Ashley, F., Baril, A., & Yergeau, R. (2024). Principlism and contemporary ethical considerations for providers of transgender healthcare. International Journal of Transgender Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2024.2303462
Bauer, G. R., Lawson, M. L., Metzger, D. L., & Trans Youth CAN! Research Team. (2022). Do clinical data from transgender adolescents support the phenomenon of "rapid onset gender dysphoria"? The Journal of Pediatrics, 243, 224–227.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.11.020
Bustos, V. P., Bustos, S. S., Mascaro, A., Del Corral, G., Forte, A. J., Ciudad, P., Kim, E. A., Langstein, H. N., & Manrique, O. J. (2021). Regret after gender-affirmation surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, 9(3), e3477. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003477
Coleman, E., Radix, A. E., Bouman, W. P., Brown, G. R., de Vries, A. L. C., Deutsch, M. B., ... & Arcelus, J. (2022). Standards of care for the health of transgender and gender diverse people, version 8. International Journal of Transgender Health, 23(S1), S1–S259. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2100644
Cornell University. (2018). What does the scholarly research say about the effect of gender transition on transgender well-being? What We Know Project. https://whatweknow.inequality.cornell.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-well-being-of-transgender-people/
deMayo, B. E., Gallagher, N. M., Leshin, R. A., & Olson, K. R. (2025). Stability and change in gender identity and sexual orientation across childhood and adolescence. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 90(1–3), 7–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12479
Elm, J. H., Lewis, J. P., Walters, K. L., & Self, J. M. (2022). Native American Two Spirit and LGBTQ health: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 34(3), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538720.2021.1913462
Endocrine Society. (n.d.). Transgender and gender diverse children and adolescents. https://www.endocrine.org/patient-engagement/endocrine-library/transgender-and-gender-diverse-children-and-adolescents
GLAAD. (2023). Medical association statements supporting trans youth healthcare. https://glaad.org/medical-association-statements-supporting-trans-youth-healthcare-and-against-discriminatory/
Hasenbush, A., Flores, A. R., & Herman, J. L. (2019). Gender identity nondiscrimination laws in public accommodations: A review of evidence regarding safety and privacy in public restrooms, locker rooms, and changing rooms. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 16(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0335-z
Herman, J. L., Flores, A. R., & Redfield, E. (2025). Safety and privacy in public restrooms and other gendered facilities [Policy Brief]. Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law. https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/safety-in-restrooms-and-facilites/
Hinchy, J. (2022). Hijras and South Asian historiography. History Compass, 20(3), e12706. https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12706
James, S. E., Herman, J. L., Durso, L. E., & Heng-Lehtinen, R. (2024). Early insights: A report of the 2022 U.S. Transgender Survey. National Center for Transgender Equality. https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/2024-02/2022%20USTS%20Early%20Insights%20Report_FINAL.pdf
Littman, L. (2018). Parent reports of adolescents and young adults perceived to show signs of a rapid onset of gender dysphoria. PLoS ONE, 13(8), e0202330. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202330
Littman, L. (2019). Correction: Parent reports of adolescents and young adults perceived to show signs of a rapid onset of gender dysphoria. PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0214157. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214157
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
Murchison, G. R., Agénor, M., Reisner, S. L., & Watson, R. J. (2019). School restroom and locker room restrictions and sexual assault risk among transgender youth. Pediatrics, 143(6), e20182902. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-2902
Park, J., et al. (2022). Long-term outcomes after gender-affirming surgery: 40-year follow-up study. Annals of Plastic Surgery. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36149983/
Reed, G. M., Drescher, J., Krueger, R. B., Atalla, E., Cochran, S. D., First, M. B., ... & Saxena, S. (2016). Disorders related to sexuality and gender identity in the ICD-11: Revising the ICD-10 classification based on current scientific evidence, best clinical practices, and human rights considerations. World Psychiatry, 15(3), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20354
Ren, T., Galenchik-Chan, A., Erlichman, Z., et al. (2024). Prevalence of regret in gender-affirming surgery: A systematic review. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 92, 597–602. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38685500/
Robinson, M. (2020). Two-Spirit identity in a time of gender fluidity. Journal of Homosexuality, 67(12), 1675–1690. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2019.1613853
Testa, R. J., Habarth, J., Peta, J., Balsam, K., & Bockting, W. (2015). Development of the Gender Minority Stress and Resilience Measure. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000081
Tordoff, D. M., Wanta, J. W., Collin, A., Stepney, C., Inwards-Breland, D. J., & Ahrens, K. (2022). Mental health outcomes in transgender and nonbinary youths receiving gender-affirming care. JAMA Network Open, 5(2), e220978. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0978
Turban, J. L., King, D., Carswell, J. M., & Keuroghlian, A. S. (2020). Pubertal suppression for transgender youth and risk of suicidal ideation. Pediatrics, 145(2), e20191725. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1725
Turban, J. L., Loo, S. S., Almazan, A. N., & Keuroghlian, A. S. (2021). Factors leading to "detransition" among transgender and gender diverse people in the United States: A mixed-methods analysis. LGBT Health, 8(4), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2020.0437
Turban, J. L., King, D., Dolotina, B., & Keuroghlian, A. S. (2023). Rapid-onset gender dysphoria is not a recognized mental health diagnosis. Journal of Adolescent Health, 73(6), 1231–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.09.009
World Health Organization. (2019). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th ed.). https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseases