Introduction: Who This Guide Is For#

This guide is for anyone who has ever heard their own voice played back and felt a jolt of wrongness—that dissonance between who you are and what comes out of your mouth.

Perhaps you're a transgender woman whose voice betrays you in every phone call, every first impression, every moment when you thought you'd finally achieved invisibility. Perhaps you're a transgender man whose voice hasn't dropped as much as you'd hoped on testosterone, leaving you caught in an in-between that doesn't feel like home. Perhaps you're nonbinary, searching for a voice that exists outside the binary altogether—something that sounds like you rather than someone else's expectations. Perhaps you're exploring whether any intervention is necessary at all, or whether the voice you have simply needs permission to be heard differently.

Whoever you are, this guide welcomes you.

Voice is one of the most powerful gender markers in human communication. Research demonstrates that listeners make rapid gender judgments based on voice alone, often within milliseconds of hearing someone speak (Gelfer & Bennett, 2013). For many transgender and gender-diverse individuals, achieving a voice that aligns with their identity represents a crucial component of transition—one that affects every social interaction, every professional encounter, every moment of self-expression.

The good news: voice modification has matured considerably over the past two decades. Voice feminization surgery achieves significant, measurable pitch elevation with approximately 80-85% patient satisfaction rates across major procedures (Lanham et al., 2025). Voice masculinization through testosterone therapy effectively lowers pitch in approximately 90% of trans masculine individuals without surgical intervention (Azul et al., 2017). For nonbinary individuals, emerging approaches target the androgynous ranges that fall between traditional masculine and feminine presentation.

The honest reality: voice surgery addresses only pitch, which accounts for roughly 41% of gender voice perception (King et al., 2012). Resonance, intonation, and communication patterns—the remaining 59%—require behavioral modification through voice therapy. Understanding this limitation is essential for setting realistic expectations about what any intervention can accomplish.

This guide provides comprehensive information about surgical and non-surgical voice modification options, what each can realistically achieve, the preparation and recovery involved, potential complications, and how to find qualified providers. The goal is not to push anyone toward any particular intervention, but to provide the knowledge necessary for informed decision-making about your own voice—a voice that, ultimately, belongs only to you.

Understanding Voice and Gender#

Before diving into modification options, understanding what makes a voice sound "masculine" or "feminine" helps clarify what different interventions can and cannot accomplish.

The Anatomy of Voice Production#

The human voice emerges from the coordinated action of three interconnected systems. The respiratory system provides the power source, generating the airflow and pressure that sets vocal fold vibration in motion. The larynx—a cartilaginous structure in the neck containing the vocal folds—serves as the oscillator, with paired vocal folds vibrating hundreds of times per second as air passes through. The vocal tract (pharynx, oral cavity, and nasal cavity) acts as a resonating chamber that shapes and amplifies the raw sound into recognizable speech (Titze, 2000).

Male and female vocal anatomy differ in measurable ways, primarily established during puberty. Adult male vocal folds measure approximately 17-23 mm in length and 6 mm in thickness, while adult female vocal folds measure approximately 10-17 mm in length and 5 mm in thickness (Baken & Orlikoff, 2000). The male larynx is positioned lower in the neck, and the male pharynx is approximately 15% longer than in females, creating a longer vocal tract that contributes to perceived masculinity independent of pitch (Simpson, 2009).

These structural differences explain a crucial asymmetry in transition-related voice care: testosterone permanently lengthens and thickens vocal folds during puberty, lowering pitch by approximately one octave. Estrogen, however, has no effect on existing vocal anatomy. This means trans women who underwent testosterone-driven puberty typically require intervention—surgery, therapy, or both—while trans men usually achieve satisfactory voice masculinization through testosterone alone.

What Makes a Voice Sound Gendered#

The primary acoustic marker for gender perception is fundamental frequency (F0), the speaking pitch measured in Hertz. Typical adult male speaking pitch ranges from 85-155 Hz with an average around 120 Hz. Female speaking pitch ranges from 165-270 Hz with an average around 200 Hz (Titze, 1989). The gender-ambiguous zone falls between approximately 145-165 Hz, where listeners become uncertain about a speaker's gender.

However, pitch alone tells only part of the story. Research demonstrates that fundamental frequency accounts for only about 41% of gender voice perception (King et al., 2012). The remaining variance comes from:

Resonance, determined by vocal tract shape and length, creates the "color" or timbre of a voice. A person can have a 200 Hz speaking pitch yet still be perceived as male if their resonance remains masculine. Resonance modification requires behavioral techniques that surgery cannot address.

Intonation patterns—the melody of speech, the way pitch rises and falls across sentences—differ between genders, with stereotypically feminine intonation showing greater variability and upward inflections.

Speech patterns including rate, articulation precision, and pragmatic communication styles (directness, hedging language, topic selection) all contribute to gender perception in ways that transcend pure acoustics.

Understanding this complexity is essential: voice surgery can reliably raise pitch, but pitch is only one piece of a multidimensional puzzle. This is why voice therapy plays such an important role whether or not someone pursues surgery.

Voice Feminization Surgery: Techniques and Outcomes#

Several surgical techniques exist for voice feminization, each targeting different aspects of vocal fold structure and function. The past two decades have seen significant refinement in these approaches, with growing outcome data to guide decision-making.

Wendler Glottoplasty: The Current Standard#

Wendler glottoplasty (also called anterior glottic web formation) has emerged as the most extensively studied and commonly performed voice feminization surgery worldwide. The International Association of TransVoice Surgeons recognizes it as the current gold standard (Remacle et al., 2020).

The procedure is performed endoscopically through the mouth under general anesthesia, requiring no external incision. Using a CO2 laser or cold instruments, the surgeon de-epithelializes the anterior commissure and the anterior 33-50% of both vocal folds, then sutures them together with resorbable thread and applies fibrin sealant. This creates an anterior glottic web that effectively shortens the vibrating portion of the vocal folds, raising fundamental frequency.

The concept is elegantly simple: if you shorten a guitar string, it produces a higher pitch. By webbing together the front portion of the vocal folds, less of their length vibrates, and the voice rises.

Outcomes data from multiple meta-analyses demonstrate consistent results. The 2025 Lanham meta-analysis of 24 studies (n=893) found speaking fundamental frequency (SF0) increases with an effect size of g=1.21, indicating large and statistically significant improvement (Lanham et al., 2025). Individual studies report mean pitch elevation of 70-80 Hz, with one large study showing increases from 135.8 Hz to 206.3 Hz—well into the female range (Mastronikolis et al., 2013). Trans Woman Voice Questionnaire (TWVQ) scores—a validated measure of voice-related distress—improve significantly, with one study showing drops from 98 to 54 points (Aires et al., 2023). Self-perceived femininity ratings increase from approximately 2.8/10 to 7.7/10 after surgery (Aires et al., 2023).

Patient satisfaction reaches approximately 80-85% across studies, with some reporting even higher rates when combined with post-operative voice therapy (Lanham et al., 2025).

Trade-offs are well-documented. Studies consistently report reduced speaking intensity (volume) and narrowed frequency range post-operatively—trade-offs that most patients find acceptable given the pitch elevation achieved (Kim et al., 2017). Professional singers requiring full dynamic range should carefully weigh these considerations.

Complications include web dehiscence (premature separation of the sutured vocal folds) in 5-13% of cases, granuloma formation in approximately 14%, and transient dysphonia in about 10% (D'haeseleer et al., 2023). Notably, systematic reviews report no postoperative infections or dysphagia specifically for Wendler glottoplasty (Lanham et al., 2025).

VFSRAC: Maximum Pitch Elevation#

The VFSRAC technique (Vocal Fold Shortening and Retrodisplacement of Anterior Commissure), developed by Dr. Hyung-Tae Kim at Yeson Voice Center in Seoul, South Korea, represents a distinct approach that has gained international recognition (Kim, 2020).

Like Wendler glottoplasty, VFSRAC is performed endoscopically without neck incision. However, the technique differs in its mechanism: rather than simply webbing the anterior vocal folds, VFSRAC dissects the anterior one-third of the vocal fold membrane and uses permanent sutures to shorten the vocal folds while retrodisplacing the anterior commissure. This modifies all three voice parameters—tension, length, and mass—simultaneously while creating a funnel-shaped glottic opening that optimizes airflow (Kim, 2020).

The largest published series (506 patients) demonstrated exceptional results: preoperative speaking F0 of 134.5 Hz rose to 212.3 Hz at 6 months, representing an average increase of approximately 74 Hz (Kim et al., 2024). Complications were notably low: pitch instability occurred in only 1.9% and decreased loudness in 1.7%, with no reported infections, granuloma formation, or abnormal web formation.

Proponents argue that VFSRAC preserves more natural phonation patterns than traditional web formation, potentially reducing the "surgical" quality some patients report after glottoplasty. However, the technique requires specialized training and is primarily available at Yeson Voice Center in Seoul and a limited number of surgeons trained in their method.

Feminization Laryngoplasty: An External Approach#

Feminization laryngoplasty (FemLar), developed by Dr. James Thomas in Portland, Oregon, takes a fundamentally different approach through an open surgical technique (Thomas & MacMillan, 2013).

The procedure involves a horizontal neck incision and several coordinated modifications: removal of a portion of the anterior thyroid cartilage (also reducing Adam's apple prominence), splitting and shortening of the vocal folds anteriorly, excision of anterior false vocal cord tissue, and—uniquely—thyrohyoid elevation to shorten the pharynx and address resonance in addition to pitch (Thomas & MacMillan, 2013).

A 17-year review of 162 patients showed mean pitch change of approximately 50 Hz (6 semitones), with the highest effect size of any procedure in comparative analyses (g=3.05) (Thomas & MacMillan, 2013). The major complication rate was only 1.2%, and results remained stable at 5-year follow-up.

The primary advantages of feminization laryngoplasty include its attention to resonance (which no other voice surgery addresses) and simultaneous Adam's apple reduction. The primary disadvantages include greater invasiveness, a visible neck scar, and potential unsuitability for professional voice users who require maximum vocal flexibility.

Cricothyroid Approximation: Why It's Fallen Out of Favor#

Cricothyroid approximation (CTA), first described by Isshiki in 1983, was one of the earliest voice feminization techniques. The external approach uses a neck incision to approximate the cricoid and thyroid cartilages with permanent sutures, mimicking cricothyroid muscle contraction to increase vocal fold tension (Isshiki et al., 1983).

Once popular, CTA has largely been abandoned by most voice surgeons due to unpredictable and unstable outcomes. The 2025 meta-analysis found CTA's pitch elevation was not statistically significant, with only 50% patient satisfaction and just 31% achieving a "passable" female voice (Lanham et al., 2025). Most concerning, pitch tends to regress over time—studies show elevation dropping from 73 Hz at 6 months to 46 Hz at 24 months (Van Borsel et al., 2008). Additional problems include falsetto-quality voice, loss of pitch modulation ability, and cricoid-thyroid cartilage fusion that makes revision impossible.

Some surgeons still offer CTA in combination with glottoplasty for patients over 40 with very low baseline pitch, but it is rarely performed as a standalone procedure.

Laser Reduction Glottoplasty: Primary or Adjunct#

Laser reduction glottoplasty (LRG) uses CO2 laser to vaporize full-thickness vocal folds including mucosa, lateral vocal ligament, and medial vocalis muscle. The procedure decreases mass and increases stiffness through scar formation, raising pitch through a different mechanism than web formation (Anderson, 2014).

Studies report mean speaking F0 increases of 66-71 Hz, with outcomes stable for five or more years (Anderson, 2014). TWVQ scores improved significantly in one study from 96.8 to 35.6. However, 25% of patients remained unsatisfied after a single LRG procedure.

LRG is increasingly used as an adjunct to Wendler glottoplasty rather than a standalone procedure. A 2024 study demonstrated that sequential Wendler glottoplasty followed by LRG achieved 100% patient satisfaction when a single procedure proved insufficient, with mean speaking F0 reaching 215 Hz (Krespi et al., 2024).

Comparing Techniques#

Direct comparative studies between techniques remain limited, but available data suggest:

Pitch elevation is highest with VFSRAC (approximately 74 Hz) and feminization laryngoplasty (approximately 50-70 Hz), followed by Wendler glottoplasty (approximately 40-70 Hz). CTA shows the lowest and least stable results.

Complication profiles favor endoscopic techniques (glottoplasty, VFSRAC) over external approaches (CTA, feminization laryngoplasty), with glottoplasty showing notably low rates of infection and dysphagia.

Durability appears superior for glottoplasty and VFSRAC compared to CTA, with studies showing maintained results at 4+ years for web-forming techniques versus documented regression with CTA.

Resonance is addressed only by feminization laryngoplasty, which includes pharyngeal shortening. All other techniques require voice therapy to address resonance.

The "best" technique depends on individual anatomy, priorities, and access to qualified surgeons. Many patients choose glottoplasty due to its extensive outcome data, low complication profile, and widespread availability.

Voice Masculinization: When Surgery Isn't Usually Necessary#

The landscape for voice masculinization differs dramatically from feminization because testosterone directly modifies vocal anatomy, making surgical intervention unnecessary for most trans masculine individuals.

Testosterone's Effects on the Voice#

Testosterone therapy causes thickening and lengthening of the vocal folds similar to male puberty, permanently lowering fundamental frequency. The mechanism increases both vocal fold length (approximately 60% longer than cisgender women over time) and causes the larynx to descend, resulting in 10-20% longer vocal tract length (Nygren et al., 2016).

The voice changes follow a predictable timeline. Within 6-10 weeks of starting testosterone, many trans men notice scratchy sensations and voice instability as their vocal folds begin thickening. The most significant pitch drop occurs in the first 2-5 months, with changes generally stabilizing by 12 months (Irwig et al., 2017). Average speaking pitch decreases from approximately 183-200 Hz (female range) to 125-134 Hz (male range)—a drop of approximately 49 Hz or 6.4 semitones (Azul et al., 2017).

The 2021 Hodges-Simeon study published in Scientific Reports found that trans men's F0 values became statistically indistinguishable from cisgender men after sufficient time on testosterone therapy (Hodges-Simeon et al., 2021). Approximately 90% achieve acceptable male-range results within 4-5 months, with 97% experiencing some deepening by 12 months and 100% by 24 months.

This high success rate explains why surgical intervention is rarely needed for trans masculine individuals—the body does the work when given the hormonal signal.

Testosterone's Limitations#

While highly effective for pitch, testosterone does not fully masculinize all voice parameters. Vocal tract length may not fully masculinize—the 2021 study found trans men's vocal tract length was significantly shorter than cisgender men, with 23% falling outside the cisgender male range (Hodges-Simeon et al., 2021).

Resonance patterns, speaking patterns, intonation, and prosody don't automatically change with hormones. Some trans men find that while their pitch has dropped into the male range, their voice still doesn't sound quite "male" to them. Additionally, approximately 37% develop vocal instability and 27% lose vocal endurance on testosterone, with 24% seeking voice therapy for issues like vocal fatigue, strain, or speaking pattern modification (Davies & Johnston, 2015).

Type III Thyroplasty: For Insufficient Masculinization#

Approximately 10-21% of trans men do not achieve cisgender male frequencies (F0 ≤131 Hz) after hormone therapy (Azul et al., 2017). For these individuals, Type III thyroplasty (relaxation thyroplasty) offers surgical voice deepening.

The procedure shortens the anteroposterior diameter of the thyroid cartilage, relaxing and shortening the vocal folds to reduce tension and increase density. Through a small neck incision under general anesthesia, the surgeon removes a vertical strip of thyroid cartilage and approximates the cut edges, effectively "loosening" the vocal folds (Isshiki et al., 1983).

The largest retrospective series in trans men (n=13) showed speaking F0 decreased from 156 Hz to 108.77 Hz—a drop of 47 Hz (p<0.001) (Remacle et al., 2020). A meta-analysis of 69 patients across 9 studies found mean difference of approximately 76 Hz (Vendramini et al., 2025). Post-operative requirements include 7 days of absolute voice rest and 3+ weeks avoiding physical exertion.

Surgery is typically considered only after minimum 12 months of testosterone therapy with documented insufficient results. Candidates should have realistic expectations that surgery provides additional lowering but cannot guarantee any specific final pitch.

Nonbinary and Gender-Expansive Voice Options#

For nonbinary and gender-expansive individuals, voice modification presents unique opportunities and challenges. The goal isn't necessarily to sound "male" or "female" but to achieve a voice that feels authentic—which may mean targeting ranges that fall between or outside binary categories.

Defining Androgynous Voice Targets#

The gender-neutral pitch range falls between typical male and female ranges, where listener perception becomes ambiguous. Multiple sources converge on similar androgynous pitch targets:

Davies & Goldberg (2006) identified 145-160 Hz as the androgynous range. Gelfer & Schofield (2000) found gender perception shifts at approximately 165 Hz. The "Q" genderless voice project, developed by researchers and designers seeking to create the first gender-neutral voice assistant, targeted 145-175 Hz as the androgynous zone (Pride, 2019). Clinical consensus generally identifies 140-165 Hz for true neutrality.

Research shows gender perception changes around the 160 Hz threshold, with voices averaging 161 Hz or higher more often perceived as female (Gelfer & Schofield, 2000).

Surgical Options for Nonbinary Goals#

Surgeons can theoretically modify standard procedures to target partial rather than complete pitch modification. For AMAB nonbinary individuals seeking feminization, the target may be the androgynous range (approximately 165 Hz) rather than the fully feminine range (>200 Hz). For AFAB nonbinary individuals, lower testosterone doses or shorter duration may achieve partial masculinization.

Johns Hopkins Medicine explicitly notes regarding voice care: "A person may not want to sound typically masculine or feminine. There are more neutral, nonbinary options" (Johns Hopkins Medicine, 2024). Some laryngologists explicitly offer customized approaches for non-standard outcomes.

However, no published surgical case reports specifically targeting nonbinary or androgynous voice outcomes exist in the medical literature. This represents a significant gap. The evidence base for nonbinary voice surgery remains essentially nonexistent, meaning patients pursuing this path have no outcome data to guide expectations.

Voice Therapy as Primary Intervention#

Given the lack of surgical evidence, voice therapy typically serves as the primary intervention for nonbinary voice goals. A 2023 case series from the Sean Parker Institute represented the first English-language study reporting on voice therapy outcomes specifically for nonbinary individuals (Chadwick et al., 2023). Four participants completed a 12-week program, with one achieving F0 increase from 146.2 Hz to 203.6 Hz.

A key finding was that "significant improvement in subjective outcomes despite small changes in acoustic measures, and vice versa"—suggesting personal satisfaction may not correlate directly with objective acoustic measurements for nonbinary individuals (Chadwick et al., 2023). What matters is whether the voice feels right, not whether it hits a particular number.

ASHA guidelines acknowledge this complexity: "Affirming goals focus on creating a voice that is authentic, comfortable, and safe. Some people prefer a 'gender-neutral' vocal presentation, whereas some people require flexibility for a more masculine or feminine presentation depending on their safety needs or social context" (ASHA, 2024).

Specialized programs for nonbinary voice work include Renée Yoxon's "Mix & Match: Designing Your Nonbinary Voice" curriculum and Seattle Voice Lab's androgynous voice training program. These approaches recognize that nonbinary voice goals may include hybrid vocal presentations, ability to switch between different voices for different situations, or targeting specific acoustic characteristics independent of binary categories.

Voice Therapy: The Non-Surgical Pathway#

Voice therapy with a speech-language pathologist (SLP) represents both an alternative to surgery and an essential complement to surgical intervention. The evidence strongly supports that combined surgery and therapy achieves superior outcomes to either alone.

What Voice Therapy Addresses#

Per the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's Practice Portal, SLPs provide expertise in modifying vocal pitch, intonation, voice quality, resonance, articulation, pragmatics, nonverbal vocalizations, and nonverbal communication (ASHA, 2024). This comprehensive scope addresses elements that surgery cannot touch—the 59% of gender perception that extends beyond fundamental frequency.

The goal of gender-affirming voice therapy extends beyond acoustic measures to help clients develop authentic voices aligned with their self-determined goals. This isn't about teaching people to "perform" a gender but about finding the voice that feels genuinely theirs.

Voice Feminization Therapy Techniques#

Voice feminization therapy employs several key techniques:

Resonance modification shifts sound production from chest/pharyngeal resonance to oral/head resonance through lip spreading, forward tongue carriage, and elevated larynx positioning. This achieves higher formant frequencies that signal femininity independent of pitch—addressing one of the most important components of gender perception that surgery cannot change.

Pitch elevation training targets speaking fundamental frequency above 160 Hz, ideally around 180-200 Hz. Techniques include semi-occluded vocal tract exercises, pitch glides, and sustained phonation practice.

Intonation training increases pitch variability and expressiveness, moving away from flatter masculine patterns toward more melodic feminine patterns.

Articulation adjustments involve more precise consonant production, extended vowel duration, and softer articulatory contacts.

Published outcomes demonstrate meaningful improvements. A 2021 systematic review of 95 transgender women found mean pitch increases of 4-7 semitones depending on speaking task (Oates, 2021). The landmark 2013 Gelfer & Tice study demonstrated that after 8 weeks of therapy, transgender women were perceived as female 50.8% of the time post-treatment versus 1.9% pre-treatment (Gelfer & Tice, 2013). At 15-month follow-up, perception dropped to 33.1%—partial maintenance without continued practice, highlighting the importance of ongoing voice work.

The Case for Combined Approaches#

The evidence strongly supports combining therapy with surgery for optimal outcomes. A 2024 meta-analysis found Trans Woman Voice Questionnaire improvement scores of -47.9 points for combined surgery and therapy versus -29.0 for surgery alone and -18.7 for therapy alone (Lanham et al., 2025). The combined approach represents a 64% greater improvement than surgery alone.

Cleveland Clinic research found patients choosing therapy alone achieved comparable outcomes to surgical patients on measured acoustic outcomes, suggesting therapy can serve as a viable standalone option for some individuals (Cleveland Clinic, 2024). However, therapy requires ongoing practice and may not achieve the same pitch elevation ceiling as surgery.

Finding a Qualified Speech-Language Pathologist#

A 2015 study found only 47% of SLP practitioners indicated transgender voice was addressed in their training, and 51% could not describe transgender voice therapy approaches (Hancock & Helenius, 2012). This means finding a qualified provider requires some research.

Resources for locating specialists include:

The ASHA ProFind Directory (asha.org/praxis/profile-find) allows filtering for "Transgender Voice" under Areas of Expertise.

The WPATH Provider Directory (transhealth.wpath.org) lists providers who specialize in gender-affirming care.

University speech clinics increasingly offer gender-affirming voice services, often at reduced rates ($35-75/session versus $75-170 in private practice).

Telehealth options have expanded access significantly, with research confirming acoustic measurements can be reliably obtained via telehealth (Dahl et al., 2021). National telehealth providers include Connected Speech Pathology, Expressable, and Blue Ridge Speech and Voice.

Questions to ask potential providers: What specific training do you have in gender-affirming voice work? How many transgender clients have you served? What assessment tools do you use (TWVQ, acoustic analysis)? What's the typical treatment duration? Do you coordinate with surgeons if I'm considering surgery? Do you offer telehealth?

Red flags include: no specific transgender voice training, guarantees about outcomes, pushing surgery without trying therapy first, not using standardized assessments, and general lack of cultural competency around gender diversity.

Self-study resources can supplement professional therapy but typically cannot replace it entirely. The TransVoiceLessons YouTube channel offers extensive free content plus paid coaching. Christella VoiceUp provides structured online courses. Seattle Voice Lab offers downloadable practice materials.

Voice Therapy Costs#

Voice therapy costs vary significantly by provider and setting:

University clinics: $35-$75 per session, often with sliding scale options Private practice: $75-$170 per session Online coaching/courses: $150-$500 for structured programs

A typical course of therapy runs 8-16 sessions over 8-12 weeks, though individual needs vary widely. Total cost for comprehensive therapy typically ranges from $500-$2,000 depending on session count and provider type.

Insurance coverage for voice therapy exceeds that for surgery but remains inconsistent. ASHA provides guidance on coding and reimbursement strategies (ASHA, 2024).

Surgical Candidacy and Assessment#

Understanding candidacy requirements helps individuals prepare for surgery and set realistic expectations about what the process involves.

WPATH Standards of Care Guidance#

The World Professional Association for Transgender Health Standards of Care Version 8 (SOC8) establishes criteria for voice surgery eligibility: persistent, well-documented gender incongruence; capacity to make fully informed decisions and consent; and age of majority (Coleman et al., 2022).

Notably, hormone therapy is not a prerequisite for voice feminization surgery. This differs from some genital surgeries that require a period of hormone therapy. Voice surgery is listed alongside other medically necessary gender-affirming surgeries in SOC8.

Mental health assessment requirements are less stringent than for genital surgery—typically one letter from a qualified health professional rather than multiple letters. Some surgeons offer informed consent models that don't require letters at all.

Health and Vocal Cord Requirements#

General health criteria include capacity to undergo surgery with general anesthesia, appropriate blood work, and controlled chronic conditions. Smoking cessation is essential—nicotine severely impacts wound healing and can lead to surgical failure. Most surgeons require complete cessation for 4-6 weeks before and after surgery.

Pre-operative assessment includes videostroboscopy to evaluate vocal fold function—examining mucosal wave, symmetry, amplitude, and glottic closure. Normal vocal fold appearance with adequate glottic closure is required. Pre-existing pathology (nodules, polyps, lesions, scarring) may preclude surgery or require treatment first.

Contraindications include active smoking (with exceedingly high surgical failure rates), pre-existing severe breathing or swallowing impairments, active reflux disease (can cause suture breakdown), inability to maintain vocal rest post-operatively, and unrealistic expectations about what surgery can achieve.

Age matters: Studies show better results in patients under 40 years, with one study finding patients under 40 achieved mean post-operative F0 of 213.8 Hz versus lower results for those 40 and older (D'haeseleer et al., 2023). Thyroid cartilage calcification increases 1.5-4% per year from birth to 50, affecting surgical approach (Thomas & MacMillan, 2013).

Setting Realistic Expectations#

The most important preparation is understanding what surgery can and cannot accomplish.

Surgery can: Reliably raise speaking pitch by approximately 40-75 Hz depending on technique; achieve fundamental frequencies in the female range for most patients; significantly improve voice-related quality of life and reduce dysphoria.

Surgery cannot: Change resonance (requires behavioral modification); change intonation patterns, speech rate, or communication styles; guarantee any specific final pitch; avoid all trade-offs (some reduction in volume and range is common); make ongoing voice work unnecessary.

A minimum F0 of 180 Hz is typically required for perception as feminine, but as noted earlier, only 41% of gender voice perception is explained by pitch alone (King et al., 2012). Achieving a feminine pitch without addressing resonance may result in a voice that sounds female in terms of pitch but not necessarily perceived as female overall.

Professional singers or those whose livelihood depends on voice should understand that glottoplasty typically reduces upper pitch range by approximately 2 semitones while eliminating lower register (Anderson, 2014). This may be an acceptable trade-off for some and a dealbreaker for others.

The Surgical Process and Recovery#

Understanding what surgery involves—and the demands of recovery—helps individuals prepare for the journey ahead.

Surgical Procedures Are Typically Outpatient#

All major voice feminization procedures require general anesthesia for the complete relaxation necessary for microlaryngeal access. Smaller endotracheal tubes (4.0-4.5 mm) are used to minimize vocal fold injury and improve visualization. Pre-operative IV steroids reduce secretions and post-operative edema.

Wendler glottoplasty takes 1-3 hours (typically 1.5 hours) using endoscopic access through the mouth. No external incision is required. Equipment includes a microscope, CO2 laser or cold instruments, microlaryngeal forceps and scissors, and specialized 70cm suture length with needle holder and knot pusher.

VFSRAC takes 1-2 hours endoscopically with permanent suture material, creating surgical sites only 3-5mm in size. Like glottoplasty, no external incision is required.

Feminization laryngoplasty takes 2-4 hours via external cervical approach with a visible neck incision.

Most patients go home same day after recovering from anesthesia, requiring a responsible adult chaperone for the first 24 hours. Overnight observation may be needed for patients without a chaperone (approximately $1,190 additional at some centers), post-operative complications, or combined extensive procedures.

Voice Rest Is Absolutely Critical#

The most important recovery requirement is strict vocal rest. This cannot be overemphasized: breaking vocal rest is the leading cause of surgical failure.

Duration varies by procedure:

Wendler glottoplasty: 10-30 days absolute silence
VFSRAC: 1-3 weeks complete rest
Feminization laryngoplasty: 2-4 weeks absolute silence
LRG/LAVA: 5-14 days complete rest

Strict voice rest means no talking, whispering (often more damaging than talking), mouthing words, moaning, groaning, sighing, grunting, humming, vocalized straining, singing, or laughing with voice. Communication occurs only through writing, texting, or text-to-speech apps. Coughing and throat clearing should be avoided when possible, with suppressant medications provided.

This is not a recommendation or a guideline. It is the difference between a successful surgery and a failed one. Premature suture breakage, need for revision, excessive scar formation, incomplete web formation, and permanent voice damage can all result from breaking voice rest.

Timeline to Final Results#

Week 1-2: Complete voice rest with swelling and inflammation at peak. The voice will sound worse before it gets better. This is normal and expected.

Week 2-3: First follow-up with surgeon for scope examination and healing assessment. Very gentle voice use may begin depending on procedure.

Week 4-8: Gradual voice use resumption with significant hoarseness expected ("surgical laryngitis" phase). Post-operative voice therapy may begin at 3 weeks minimum.

Month 2-3: Swelling continuing to decrease. Post-operative speech therapy typically begins in earnest around 3 months.

Month 3-6: Voice starts to stabilize. Good indication of final outcome by month 3.

Final pitch stabilization occurs at 6-12 months, with complete healing and adaptation. Some continued changes are possible for 1-2 years, particularly with permanent suture techniques.

Activity restrictions include no aerobic exercise for 3+ weeks, no weight lifting for 1+ month, and soft foods only for 2-3 weeks. Return to work timelines vary: 2-4 weeks off for voice-dependent jobs, 5-7 days for non-voice-dependent jobs with accommodations.

Additional requirements include acid-suppressing medication for 6+ weeks (reflux can damage healing tissue), avoiding alcohol for 1-3 months, and no smoking—ideally quitting permanently.

The Importance of Post-Operative Voice Therapy#

Post-operative speech therapy optimizes outcomes by addressing the elements surgery cannot change. Therapy typically begins 3 weeks post-surgery with gentle exercises, with full therapy starting around 3 months.

Goals include formant tuning (matching resonance to new fundamental frequency), preventing "reverse adaptation" (unconsciously dropping pitch back toward pre-surgical baseline), phonatory pattern retraining, and resonance enhancement.

The evidence strongly supports therapy's importance: TWVQ scores improved most with combined glottoplasty plus voice therapy (-47.9) versus glottoplasty alone (-29.0) (Lanham et al., 2025). Surgery addresses only pitch; therapy addresses everything else.

Complications and Their Management#

Understanding potential complications helps individuals make informed decisions and recognize problems early if they occur.

Common Complications Have Manageable Rates#

Wendler glottoplasty complications include web dehiscence (5-13%), granuloma formation (approximately 14%), suture line breakdown (typically from non-compliance with voice rest), and transient dysphonia (approximately 10%, resolves with conservative management) (D'haeseleer et al., 2023). Systematic reviews report no postoperative infections or dysphagia specifically for Wendler glottoplasty.

CTA complications are more common: wound infection (7%), postoperative dysphagia (up to 29%), pitch lowering over time in a significant minority of patients, scar/puckering at incision site, reduced loudness, decreased vocal range, and pitch instability (Van Borsel et al., 2008).

Voice quality issues across procedures include reduced speaking intensity (common and long-term), reduced intensity range (persistent), temporary voice quality decline (universal, with progressive recovery), vocal fatigue (more frequent with surgical combinations), and roughness (variable).

Revision Surgery#

Wendler glottoplasty revision rate is approximately 9.7% (D'haeseleer et al., 2023). Feminization laryngoplasty revision rates reach as high as 41% in some sources, though this may reflect the procedure's use in difficult or revision cases (Thomas & MacMillan, 2013). CTA is difficult to revise—many institutions have stopped performing CTA in favor of more revisable procedures.

Reasons for revision include suture line breakdown (usually from non-compliance with voice rest), insufficient web formation, inadequate pitch elevation, and pitch regression over time.

Sequential procedures can address inadequate results from a single surgery. A study of Wendler glottoplasty followed by laser reduction glottoplasty achieved 100% patient satisfaction when a single procedure proved insufficient (Krespi et al., 2024).

Serious Complications Are Rare#

A study of 362 patients undergoing anterior glottoplasty reported 1.9% pitch instability, 1.7% decreased loudness, and 0% infections, granuloma formation, or abnormal web formation (Kim et al., 2024). Major complications requiring hospitalization occur in less than 1% of cases.

Rare but potential complications include airway compromise from severe swelling (may require tracheostomy in extreme cases), aspiration pneumonia risk, and significant voice loss (associated with asymmetrical vocal fold healing).

Long-Term Considerations#

Pitch regression is primarily a CTA concern, with documented drops from 73 Hz at 6 months to 46 Hz at 24 months (Van Borsel et al., 2008). Approximately 20% of CTA patients may experience gradual F0 drop over time, linked to age >45 and smoking. Glottoplasty and VFSRAC show more stable long-term results.

Future intubation requires special consideration. All future medical providers should be informed of voice surgery history. A smaller endotracheal tube (size 6 or smaller) should be used, and intubation should preferably wait at least 6 months after voice surgery when possible.

Long-Term Outcomes and Satisfaction#

Understanding typical outcomes helps calibrate expectations and evaluate whether surgery is likely to meet your goals.

Satisfaction Rates Reach 80-85%#

The 2025 Lanham meta-analysis found satisfaction rates of approximately 80-85% across voice therapy, endoscopic shortening, and Wendler glottoplasty (Lanham et al., 2025). Wendler glottoplasty showed high effect size (g=1.82) on patient-reported outcomes with moderate evidence quality.

Some studies report mixed satisfaction related to scarring/fibrosis affecting vocal function—one found 40% satisfied and 40% dissatisfied with glottoplasty alone (Mora et al., 2018). Combined approaches with post-operative therapy show higher satisfaction rates.

Quality of Life Measures Show Consistent Improvement#

Trans Woman Voice Questionnaire (TWVQ) results demonstrate consistent improvement across studies. Aires et al. (2023) found scores dropping from 98.3±9.2 to 54.1±25.0 (a 44-point improvement, p=0.007). D'haeseleer et al. (2023) found improvement from 84±17 to 51±17 (a 33-point improvement).

Voice Handicap Index scores improved from 38 to 24 with glottoplasty, 45.9 to 27.5 with combined glottoplasty and LRG, and 57.9 to 48.7 with VFSRAC (n=313) (Kim et al., 2024).

Research demonstrates a strong correlation (r²=0.83, p=0.0001) between pitch alteration and quality of life improvement (Aires et al., 2023). This suggests that achieving meaningful acoustic change predicts psychological benefit.

Self-perceived femininity increased from 2.8±1.8 to 7.7±2.4 on a 10-point scale after glottoplasty (p=0.008) (Aires et al., 2023).

Regret Rates for Gender-Affirming Surgery Are Very Low#

A meta-analysis of 7,928 patients found overall gender-affirming surgery regret prevalence of just 1% (95% CI <1%-2%), with transfeminine surgeries at 1% and transmasculine surgeries at <1% (Bustos et al., 2021). For comparison, GAS regret rates are dramatically lower than breast reconstruction (0-47%), bariatric surgery (19.5%), or prostatectomy (30%).

No large-scale studies specifically on voice surgery regret have been published, though reasons for dissatisfaction when reported include side effects (reduced loudness, fibrosis), insufficient pitch elevation, reduced vocal quality or range, and pitch regression.

Long-Term Durability#

Glottoplasty appears more durable than CTA. Studies show speaking F0 normally maintained with latency of at least 4 years for glottoplasty (Kelly et al., 2019), though 20% may experience gradual F0 drop (linked to age >45 and smoking). CTA shows less stability, with documented regression over 2-4 years.

VFSRAC data shows mean speaking F0 of 196.7 Hz at 3 months improving to 212.3 Hz at 6 months and stabilizing at 207.5 Hz beyond one year (Kim et al., 2024).

A significant research gap exists: most studies report only 6-12 month follow-up. Longer-term durability data beyond 2 years remains scarce.

Costs and Insurance Coverage#

Financial considerations often play a significant role in access to voice care.

US Surgical Costs#

Glottoplasty: $3,000-$9,000 (most common procedure) CTA: $4,000-$12,000 (often combined with glottoplasty) Feminization laryngoplasty: $6,000-$15,000 Combined procedures (e.g., vocal feminization + tracheal shave): $8,000-$11,000

Specific surgeon pricing varies. Voice and Sleep Institute (Dr. Weidenbecher) charges $6,100 for vocal feminization surgery, $8,000 combined with tracheal shave. Dr. Haben (Rochester, NY) offers a $7,000 package including 2 nights hotel, round-trip medical transport, and surgery.

These prices typically include surgeon fees, facility costs, anesthesia, and basic follow-up—but not voice therapy, travel, or potential revision surgery.

Insurance Coverage Remains Limited#

A 2021 analysis found only 2.7% (4 of 150) commercial insurers had favorable policies for voice surgery, with 75.8% (113 of 150) providing no coverage and 62.4% explicitly excluding voice therapy and surgery equally (DeVore et al., 2021).

Some Blue Cross Blue Shield plans in certain states cover voice therapy and/or laryngoplasty under specific conditions, requiring diagnosis of gender dysphoria and reasonable control of any mental health issues.

State mandates: 22 states plus DC have coverage requirements for private payers; 21 states plus DC have affirmative Medicaid coverage. States with requirements include California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington (Movement Advancement Project, 2024).

Medicare has no National Coverage Determination; coverage is determined case-by-case by local Medicare Administrative Contractors.

CPT codes: 31599 ("unlisted larynx procedure") is the primary code for endoscopic laryngoplasty. 31545/31546 cover laryngoscopy with vocal cord surgery. 92524 covers speech/language/voice evaluation.

Appeals and Financial Assistance#

Common denial reasons include "cosmetic" classification, clinical requirements not met, out-of-network provider, and missing documentation.

Appeal strategies include gathering additional documentation, peer-to-peer review (your doctor speaks directly with insurance medical reviewer), and external appeal to an independent third party. See U.S. Insurance, Costs, and Documents for comprehensive appeal strategies.

Financial assistance programs: Point of Pride's Annual Transgender Surgery Fund (applications November 1-30 annually), TransMission micro-grants, For the Gworls (Black trans-led), and crowdfunding through GoFundMe remain common options. See U.S. Insurance, Costs, and Documents for comprehensive grant program details, application timelines, and realistic expectations about award competitiveness.

Finding Providers#

Access to qualified providers varies significantly by location and procedure type.

Major US Academic Centers#

Mount Sinai (New York City): Grabscheid Voice and Swallowing Center, part of Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery, offers Wendler glottoplasty, tracheal shave, and comprehensive voice therapy with 4-6 sessions over 8-10 weeks.

UCLA Gender Health Program (Los Angeles): Seeks insurance approval when possible; offers Wendler glottoplasty, LAVA, CTA, and laryngeal shave with care coordination team.

Massachusetts Eye and Ear (Boston): Individual and group therapy options with board-certified otolaryngologist plus speech-language pathologists.

Stanford Health Care: Comprehensive voice therapy and surgery program.

University of Michigan Health: Voice Care program with surgical and therapy options.

University of Washington: Transgender & Gender Nonbinary Health Program with gender-affirming voice surgery.

Cleveland Clinic: Voice Center with transgender-specific programming.

Prominent Private Practice Surgeons#

Dr. James Thomas (Portland, OR): Developed feminization laryngoplasty; 35+ years experience; pioneered thyrohyoid elevation for resonance modification.

The Spiegel Center (Newton, MA): Dr. Jeffrey Spiegel with 25+ years voice surgery experience; modified Wendler technique.

Dr. Charles Haben (Rochester, NY): Performed hundreds of pitch alteration surgeries; co-edited definitive guide to Gender Affirmation Surgery of voice/face/neck.

Allure Esthetic (Seattle, WA): Multiple techniques including CTA, Wendler, LRG, and ACA.

International Destinations#

Yeson Voice Center (Seoul, South Korea): World leader in voice feminization surgery. Developed VFSRAC technique (Dr. Hyung-Tae Kim, 2007). Patients from 46+ countries. Cost approximately $7,200-$7,500 (not including travel). Requires 8-10 days minimum stay with follow-up checkups at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Thailand: Lower costs at $3,300-$5,000 (40-60% savings vs. US). Kamol Cosmetic Hospital (Bangkok) has performed over 5,000 gender confirmation surgeries since 1997. Yanhee International Hospital charges approximately $3,735 including 2 nights, meals, and medications.

European options: UK (Mr. Chadwan Al Yaghchi, Dr. Nick Hamilton), Germany (MEDICAL VOICE CENTER), Spain (Centro Médico Teknon, Barcelona with Dr. Jordi Coromina).

International surgery requires careful planning for follow-up care, managing complications locally if they arise, and arranging voice therapy at home.

Questions to Ask Prospective Surgeons#

How many voice feminization procedures have you performed? What average pitch elevation do you achieve? Can I hear before-and-after recordings or speak with former patients? What is your complication rate? Revision rate? What is your approach to post-operative voice therapy? What is the total cost, and what does it include? What are your specific voice rest requirements?

Red flags include lack of fellowship training in laryngology, vague or unavailable outcome data, no connection to speech pathology services, inability to explain technique rationale, and pressure to proceed quickly without adequate assessment.

Combining Voice Surgery with Other Procedures#

Voice surgery intersects with other gender-affirming procedures in ways worth understanding.

Tracheal Shave#

Voice surgery can be combined with tracheal shave (chondrolaryngoplasty) in a single session, saving anesthesia and facility costs while achieving cosmetic and acoustic goals simultaneously. Many surgeons offer combined packages at $8,000-$11,000.

The tracheal shave reduces the prominence of the Adam's apple (thyroid cartilage) through a small incision. When combined with voice surgery, the same access can address both goals.

Timing Relative to Other Surgeries#

Voice surgery should generally not be combined with facial feminization surgery (FFS) due to intubation concerns—procedures requiring general anesthesia should precede voice surgery by at least 3 months or follow it by at least 6 months with modified intubation technique.

Any future surgery requiring intubation should use a smaller endotracheal tube (size 6 or smaller) to avoid disrupting surgical results. All anesthesiologists should be informed of voice surgery history.

Voice Surgery and Genital Surgery#

These procedures can typically be scheduled independently without conflict, though recovery demands should be considered. Pursuing multiple major surgeries in quick succession creates cumulative physical and psychological stress. Many individuals space their procedures 6-12 months apart.

Reflection Questions#

When you imagine waking up tomorrow with a voice that fully aligns with your gender identity, what does that sound like? What specific qualities matter most to you—pitch, resonance, how you're perceived on the phone, something else?
How does your voice currently affect your daily life? Are there situations you avoid because of your voice? Interactions that cause particular distress? How might voice modification change these experiences?
Voice therapy requires ongoing practice—not just during treatment but potentially for years to maintain gains. How do you honestly assess your commitment to this work? What would help you stay consistent?
If you're considering surgery, how do you weigh the reliable pitch elevation against the trade-offs (reduced volume, narrowed range, recovery demands)? Are there aspects of your current voice you want to preserve?
What role does "passing" play in your voice goals? Is your primary motivation internal comfort or external perception? How might this affect your satisfaction with different outcomes?
If you're nonbinary or gender-expansive, what does "the right voice" mean for you outside the binary framework? What would help you articulate your goals to a provider?
What is your timeline, and what's driving it? Is there external pressure—social, professional, safety-related—affecting your decisions? What would happen if you took more time?
Who in your life knows about your voice goals? What support do you have for recovery if you pursue surgery? Who will communicate for you during voice rest?
Have you connected with others who have modified their voices? What have you learned from their experiences? What questions remain?
Beyond the practical considerations, what does voice mean to you? What would it feel like to have a voice that's genuinely, unmistakably yours?

References#

Aires, M. M., Marinho, C. B., Souza, C. S., & Pedrão, T. S. (2023). Voice outcome of glottoplasty in trans women. Journal of Voice, 37(4), 634.e9-634.e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.03.024

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2024). Gender-affirming voice and communication [Practice portal]. https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/professional-issues/gender-affirming-voice-and-communication/

Anderson, J. A. (2014). Pitch elevation in trangendered patients: Anterior glottic web formation assisted by temporary injection augmentation. Journal of Voice, 28(6), 816-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.05.002

Azul, D., Arnold, A., & Neuschaefer-Rube, C. (2017). Do transmasculine speakers present with voice problems? Insights from a participant-centered mixed-methods study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(9), 2703-2717. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0410

Baken, R. J., & Orlikoff, R. F. (2000). Clinical measurement of speech and voice (2nd ed.). Singular Publishing Group.

Bustos, V. P., Bustos, S. S., Mascaro, A., Del Corral, G., Forte, A. J., Ciudad, P., Kim, E. A., Langstein, H. N., & Manrique, O. J. (2021). Regret after gender-affirmation surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, 9(3), e3477. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003477

Chadwick, K. A., Coleman, R. O., & Scherer, R. C. (2023). Voice modification for nonbinary and genderqueer individuals: A case series. Journal of Voice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.01.018

Cleveland Clinic. (2024). Voice feminization surgery: Benefits, risks & recovery. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/procedures/voice-feminization-surgery

Coleman, E., Radix, A. E., Bouman, W. P., Brown, G. R., de Vries, A. L. C., Deutsch, M. B., Ettner, R., Fraser, L., Goodman, M., Green, J., Hancock, A. B., Johnson, T. W., Karasic, D. H., Knudson, G. A., Leibowitz, S. F., Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L., Monstrey, S. J., Motmans, J., Nahata, L., ... Arcelus, J. (2022). Standards of care for the health of transgender and gender diverse people, version 8. International Journal of Transgender Health, 23(Suppl 1), S1–S259. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2100644

Dahl, K. L., Hünermund, J., Bressmann, T., & Howell, P. (2021). Reliability of acoustic measures obtained via telehealth. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 73(2), 151-159. https://doi.org/10.1159/000508657

Davies, S., & Goldberg, J. M. (2006). Clinical aspects of transgender speech feminization and masculinization. International Journal of Transgenderism, 9(3-4), 167-196. https://doi.org/10.1300/J485v09n03_08

Davies, S., & Johnston, J. R. (2015). Exploring the validity of the Transsexual Voice Questionnaire for male-to-female transsexuals. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 39(1), 40-51.

DeVore, E. K., Gadkaree, S. K., Engstrom, A., Shaye, D., & Naunheim, M. R. (2021). Coverage for gender-affirming voice surgery and therapy for transgender individuals. The Laryngoscope, 131(5), 1023-1028. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28986

D'haeseleer, E., Claeys, S., Bettens, K., Van Calster, M., Van Damme, E., Van de Velde, D., & Van Lierde, K. (2023). Voice outcome of glottoplasty in trans women. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 280(2), 785-795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07636-x

Gelfer, M. P., & Bennett, Q. E. (2013). Speaking fundamental frequency and vowel formant frequencies: Effects on perception of gender. Journal of Voice, 27(5), 556-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.11.008

Gelfer, M. P., & Schofield, K. J. (2000). Comparison of acoustic and perceptual measures of voice in male-to-female transsexuals perceived as female versus those perceived as male. Journal of Voice, 14(1), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(00)80092-2

Gelfer, M. P., & Tice, R. M. (2013). Perceptual and acoustic outcomes of voice therapy for male-to-female transgender individuals immediately after therapy and 15 months later. Journal of Voice, 27(3), 335-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.07.009

Hancock, A. B., & Helenius, L. (2012). Adolescent male-to-female transgender voice and communication therapy. Journal of Communication Disorders, 45(5), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.06.008

Hodges-Simeon, C. R., Grail, G. P. O., Albert, G., Brindle, K. A., Cardenas, R. A., Fenning, T. M., ... & Gaulin, S. J. (2021). Testosterone therapy masculinizes speech and gender presentation in transgender men. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 3494. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82134-2

Irwig, M. S., Childs, K., & Hancock, A. B. (2017). Effects of testosterone on the transgender male voice. Andrology, 5(1), 107-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12278

Isshiki, N., Taira, T., & Tanabe, M. (1983). Surgical alteration of the vocal pitch. Journal of Otolaryngology, 12(5), 335-340.

Johns Hopkins Medicine. (2024). Transgender and gender-diverse voice care. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/treatment-tests-and-therapies/transgender-and-gender-diverse-voice-care

Kelly, V., Hertegård, S., Eriksson, J., Nygren, U., & Södersten, M. (2019). Effects of gender-confirming pitch-raising surgery in transgender women a long-term follow-up study of acoustic and patient-reported data. Journal of Voice, 33(5), 781-791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.03.014

Kim, H. T. (2020). Vocal fold shortening and retrodisplacement of anterior commissure for voice feminization: Surgical technique and voice outcome. Laryngoscope, 130(5), 1280-1285. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28146

Kim, H. T., Kim, J. M., & Kim, M. J. (2017). Surgical outcomes of vocal fold shortening and retrodisplacement of the anterior commissure for voice feminization. Laryngoscope, 127(12), 2802-2807. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26679

Kim, H. T., Park, S. H., & Lee, S. H. (2024). Update of vocal fold shortening with retrodisplacement of anterior commissure for voice feminization. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 133(3), 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894231217234

King, R. S., Brown, G. R., & McCrea, C. R. (2012). Voice parameters that result in identification or misidentification of biological gender in male-to-female transgender veterans. International Journal of Transgenderism, 13(3), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2011.664464

Krespi, Y. P., Har-El, G., & Price, D. B. (2024). Sequential Wendler glottoplasty and laser reduction glottoplasty for voice feminization. The Laryngoscope, 134(1), 281-286. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.30831

Lanham, K. M., Garcia, K. A., & Johns, M. M. (2025). Efficacy and patient satisfaction in voice feminization procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.683

Mastronikolis, N. S., Remacle, M., Biagini, M., Kiagiadaki, D., & Lawson, G. (2013). Wendler glottoplasty: An effective pitch raising surgery in male-to-female transsexuals. Journal of Voice, 27(4), 516-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.01.016

Mora, E., Carrillo, A., Giribet, A., Becerra, A., Lucio, M. J., & Cobeta, I. (2018). Translation, cultural adaptation, and preliminary evaluation of the Spanish version of the Transgender Voice Questionnaire for male-to-female transsexuals (TVQMtF). Journal of Voice, 32(4), 514.e1-514.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.06.012

Movement Advancement Project. (2024). Equality maps: Healthcare laws and policies. https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps/healthcare_laws_and_policies

Nygren, U., Nordenskjöld, A., Arver, S., & Södersten, M. (2016). Effects on voice fundamental frequency and satisfaction with voice in trans men during testosterone treatment—A longitudinal study. Journal of Voice, 30(6), 766.e23-766.e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.10.016

Oates, J. (2021). Evidence-based practice in transgender voice and communication. In R. K. Adler, S. Hirsch, & J. Pickering (Eds.), Voice and communication therapy for the transgender/gender diverse client: A comprehensive clinical guide (3rd ed., pp. 45-68). Plural Publishing.

Point of Pride. (2024). Annual transgender surgery fund. https://www.pointofpride.org/annual-transgender-surgery-fund

Pride, S. (2019, March 11). Meet Q, the genderless voice assistant. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/q-genderless-voice-assistant/

Remacle, M., Lawson, G., & Jamart, J. (2020). Results of Wendler's glottoplasty in 32 male-to-female transsexuals: Modification of the technique after 15 years of experience. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 277(8), 2257-2263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05987-3

Simpson, A. P. (2009). Phonetic differences between male and female speech. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(2), 621-640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00125.x

Thomas, J. P., & MacMillan, C. (2013). Feminization laryngoplasty: Assessment of surgical pitch elevation. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 270(10), 2695-2700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2511-3

Titze, I. R. (1989). Physiologic and acoustic differences between male and female voices. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85(4), 1699-1707. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397959

Titze, I. R. (2000). Principles of voice production (2nd ed.). National Center for Voice and Speech.

Van Borsel, J., Van Eynde, E., De Cuypere, G., & Bonte, K. (2008). Feminine after cricothyroid approximation? Journal of Voice, 22(3), 379-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.10.011

Vendramini, M., Lechien, J. R., Mondina, M., Molteni, G., & Barillari, M. R. (2025). Type III thyroplasty for patients with high-pitched voice disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1185